I'm just back from hospital having delivering her this morning.
Everybody tells me it's a very routine op. these days but of course
every procedure carries some risk. I'll be very glad to have her
home safe again.
16 years ago, SWMBO had her hip replaced. Short time in the OR, short
horspital stay, 3" incision, rapid recovery to state far better than
formerly.
Fifteen years later, the prosthesis snapped spontaneously. The only
upside was that it didn't happen while she was descending our late
19th c. break-neck stair. She just fell down next to the kitchen
sink.
But hip arthroplasty *revision* is very different from initial hip
arthroplasty. Three hours in OR, 12" incision, collateral tissue
trauma, almost a fortnight in horspital, slow and as yet incomplete
recovery.
So take care of her. No heavy-impact recreation and like that.
On the topic of surgical *revision*, cardiac pacemaker is another
worrisome instance. A long-time friend had a pacemaker with an
endocardial lead installed ca. 25 years ago. 15-minute surgical
procedure. Never any problems until a valve replacement became
necessary. Pacemaker had to go, now regarded as unsuitable anyhow for
the original diagnosis.
First, specialist endocardial lead removal cardiovascular surgeons spent
3 hours removing the lead. Then they went home and a new team of
cardiovascular surgeons undertook the valve replacement. IIRC, he was
on the table for over 6 hours.
Happy to report that he's made full recovery, is once again flying to
rightpondia for wine and opera. But The *revision* procedure prognosis
beforehand was scary and uncertain enough the he bid all his friends
farewell.
--
Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada